In the 1970s a curious chapter unfolded. Uri Geller drew public attention by claiming he could bend spoons and read minds. That era pushed researchers to test whether such talents could serve national needs.
The u.s. government quietly funded experiments to see if odd skills could influence critical sites like nuclear facilities. National security reporter Annie Jacobsen later noted these efforts aimed to gain an edge against rival powers.
Many people still find it hard to believe the military spent time and money on such work. Yet the driving force was simple: understand the mind and hunt for any advantage in tense global times.
Key Takeaways
- Official tests in the 1970s sought unusual abilities for strategic use.
- Uri Geller’s claims helped spark public and scientific interest.
- Secrecy marked many of these experiments.
- Efforts aimed to give the government an edge during Cold War tensions.
- For more on claimed abilities, see a detailed overview at psychic powers.
The Origins of the History of the US Military Psychic Spying Program
Documents found in Berlin after 1945 led U.S. analysts to study Nazi occult projects. Those files mentioned the Ahnenerbe and raised questions about unusual research that might hold value for national security.
Officials examined recovered data to see whether perception-based methods could yield actionable information. Some people believed viewing and similar ideas merited formal research.

The Nazi Connection
Allied teams turned over captured documents that described experiments and curiosities. By studying the name and methods in those files, intelligence officers hoped to gain information that would protect national interests.
The Cold War Arms Race
Fear of Soviet advances amplified interest. An intelligence agency worried rivals might develop techniques to influence behavior or gather secrets.
- Recovered documents provided a starting point for government research.
- Stories about foreign programs helped justify continued experiments.
- Many advocates argued these efforts were legitimate fields for study.
Why it mattered
The combination of wartime finds and Cold War stakes pushed funding and attention toward these lines of inquiry. For a review of claimed abilities and how they were tested, see a discussion on clairvoyant abilities. For practical methods linked to early research, a primer is available at psychic development for beginners.
| Year | Source | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| 1945 | Berlin documents (Ahnenerbe) | Prompted archival study and initial experiments |
| Late 1940sâ1950s | Intelligence assessments | Framed research as national security interest |
| Cold War era | Operational fears | Justified ongoing funding and clandestine stories |
| Result | Continued research | Built a foundation for later viewing experiments |
Inside the World of Remote Viewing and Project Stargate
Project Stargate brought remote viewing into a formal research setting run by the Defense Intelligence Agency during the 1980s. That effort tried to learn a new way to gather intelligence during the cold war.
Teams at Fort Meade and other sites asked trained subjects to visualize distant targets. Sessions tested whether viewing could provide accurate information for collection tasks.

Notable cases shaped belief in this work. In 1976 Rosemary Smith helped locate a downed Soviet aircraft, and in 1989 Angela Ford provided location data that led to an arrest. Such results kept funding alive.
Scientists ran controlled experiments to judge reliability. Many people on both sides of the research felt uneasy about secrecy, yet some results seemed promising enough to warrant more study.
- Purpose: test remote viewing for intelligence collection.
- Method: trained subjects visualized hidden targets under controlled conditions.
- Outcome: mixed results, but enough useful information to continue research.
For a closer look at claimed abilities and related study, see a detailed overview on clairvoyant abilities and science.
Scientific Skepticism and the Search for Proof
A push for independent evaluation forced a candid look at decades of claims. In 1995 the Defense Intelligence Agency allowed the American Institutes for Research to review documents and test data from Fort Meade.
The External Review Process
Two reviewersâJessica Utts and Ray Hymanâexamined methods, statistics, and session notes to judge whether remote viewing produced reliable information.
Physicist Sean Carroll and many other scientists argued that current neuroscience offers no mechanism for ESP; brain signals would need to be detectable for proof to exist.
- The intelligence agency wanted to know if viewing results were meaningful or just lucky guesses.
- Reviewers found some intriguing results but often flagged weak controls and inconsistent replication.
- After decades and many experiments, critics noted the data rarely met strict peer-review standards.

| Year | Reviewer | Finding |
|---|---|---|
| 1995 | Jessica Utts | Some statistical signals noted, called for further study |
| 1995 | Ray Hyman | Methodological flaws undermined many claimed results |
| 1995 | Defense Intelligence Agency | Concluded evidence was mixed and inconclusive for national security use |
For a broader look at claimed abilities and modern perspectives, see psychic superpowers.
Conclusion: The Lingering Mystery of Paranormal Intelligence
Debate still swirls about whether remote viewing ever yielded reliable intelligence. The official program ended in the 1990s, yet stories about viewing and secret tests keep drawing interest.
Researchers such as Dean Radin continue careful research into anomalous cognition. Their work asks whether human perception holds untapped powers and what that would mean for science and security.
For readers who want to explore claimed abilities, see a clear guide to clairvoyant abilities and an overview of extra-sensory perception.
Whether fact or fancy, these events left lasting resultsâa reminder that curiosity and caution often walk together when a government chases an edge in intelligence.